A recent South Australian scheme looked at installing in socially disadvantaged housing a TESLA Powerwall 2 battery energy storage system with no renewable energy component at all to help with the bills.
So what kind of savings can be achieved with this strategy?
In this article we will look at the overall savings on these “gifted systems” and then look at what kind of payback period you would get if purchasing a system, what if we included a renewable energy component such as photovoltaics, solar and what are the other options available to invest your money on.
In the scheme mentioned the participants where each given a Tesla Powerwall 2;
So how will this system save money? It’s all based on the assumptions that there is a peak tariff and off peak tariff period and the difference between the two is considerable:
Now when energy is drawn from a battery it has to be replaced and this replacement process is not 100 % efficient:
We will assume that the home in question has an average daily load:
Let’s say that the battery delivers 13.5 kWh/day x 365 x 10 years:
The battery delivers 13.5 kWh/day so in the first year:
Let’s assume that the household continues to use the maximum for the TESLA Powerwall 2 of 13.5 kWh/day, the peak and off peak price increases 2% every year:
This is great if you don’t have to pay for the system and it is based on a fairly large discrepancy between peak and off peak.
For example, what if the off peak rate was $0.19?
Not looking so good now!
If you had to pay for the system what would the savings look like? Let’s assume, to supply and install, the company charges $15,000 for the TESLA Powerwall 2.
How many years would it take to pay off?
It takes 27 years!
Hang on, the product is warranted for 10 years!
At the moment interest rates are pretty low so will assume I can access 1% interest compounded monthly:
So if we add a renewable component solar:
We know we have a 20 kWh household load so let’s add 5 kW of solar, assume a day/night load ratio of 60:40 and solar will produce on average, 5 x 3.6 = 17 - 18 kWh/day ( assuming Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)
Total cost of the system is $20,000 + GST.
Solar obviously only produces during the day and during the day 60% of total loads are consumed which equates to 20 kWh x 0.6 =12 kWh that can be addressed with solar so the remaining 5-6 kWh can contribute to battery charging.
In reality it is not that simple as there are many factors that play a role.
What would the financial cost be on solar only?
Let’s make some assumptions:
Overnight the batteries will contribute 8 kWh out of a possible max available of 13.5 kWh.
Question is do we allow the grid to fully replenish the batteries or partially and let the solar do a bit more?
The reality is there is no perfect charge / discharge cycle, as batteries will contribute to loads in morning and afternoon if solar isn’t enough.
Here goes:
There will be some export of solar to the grid and the batteries will be fully replenished overnight by grid, filling the 8 kWh used and 90% of the solar will be used during the day; for loads and battery charging.
✅ Energy storage only system can negate a certain amount of energy from the grid
✅ This scenario relies on a difference between peak and off peak tariffs
✅ More viable to have a combination of solar and energy storage
✅ There are many factors to consider when making assessments of the worth of energy storage
If you'd like to see what Greenwood Solutions get up to in the real world of renewable energy, solar, battery storage and grid protection - check out our Industry and Commercial pages:
https://www.greenwoodsolutions.com.au/industry
https://www.greenwoodsolutions.com.au/commercial